A Imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, for eight months, for eight months, and for six months, for each of the defendants C.

except that this shall not apply.

Defendant

A, as a business operator of the massage procedure in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H H 1st to arrange commercial sex acts against many unspecified men who employ female employees and visit the said massage procedure, and Defendant B, as a franchisor, was aware that Defendant A intended to arrange commercial sex acts as above, he lent his name to Defendant A on condition that Defendant A would receive two million won per month from Defendant A, and had Defendant C engage in commercial sex acts by registering the business operator of the said massage procedure, and Defendant C, as the head of the business office of the said massage procedure on condition that Defendant C would receive three million won per month, planned to arrange commercial sex acts by means of overall management of business related to commercial sex acts in the said massage procedure.

From September 3, 2013 to December 27, 2013, the Defendants made female employees to have sexual intercourse against many unspecified males in return for the payment of KRW 140,000 per hour to customers J, K, etc. visiting the said massage place. Moreover, the Defendants made female employees to have sexual intercourse between September 3, 2013 and December 27, 2013.

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against J, M, L, or K;

1. Each statement of the N orO;

1. Application of statutes on business registration certificates;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic [based on the calculation of the amount of additional collection] (see Supreme Court Decision 2009Do2223, May 14, 2009): Defendant A: Sales amounting to KRW 113,680,00 (=7 (one-day customer number) x 140,000 (one-day customer number).