However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around April 17, 2020, the Defendant: (a) around 03:35, on April 17, 2020, when he was found to be “Dma” in Singue C; (b) when he was prepared in advance with a knife at the entrance of the said Mt; (c) intruded with a knife with a knife with a knife at the entrance of the said Mt; and (d) when he was deprived of the cash amount of KRW 400,000 owned by the victim B, who was in Singue

2. Around May 6, 2020, the Defendant committed the crime at around 03:51 on May 6, 2020, and invaded into the said Mate in the same manner, and then stolen approximately KRW 22,000 by taking out approximately KRW 22,00 from the victim B, which was in the calculation unit in the said Mate.

Summary of Evidence

1. The application of statutes to the Defendant’s report on the seizure of the police statement made by the Defendant on the law-abiding B, the application of 11 copy of the DNA CCTV image data on April 17, 2020 as the list of seizure list, and the application of the DNA CCTV screen on May 6, 2020, and the report on the completion of the seized objects photograph (on-site lag, victim’s statement, and CCTV reading).

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The following circumstances are considered: 4 times of a fine for a thief crime on the grounds of sentencing; 4 times of a fine for a thief crime; 4 times of a imprisonment with labor; 4 times of damage recovery; 4; and 5 times of a full agreement after damage recovery; 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act; and 48(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings for Dismissal of Application for Compensation;