However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 5, 2017, at around 01:15, the Defendant: (a) received a report on a taxi free of duty in front of the taxi platform at Kim Jong-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, and received a recommendation for returning home from C, and subsequently, (b) took a bath to “Is to n't have to n't n't n't n't n't n't n't n't have to n't n't n't n't n't have to n't n't n't have to n't n't n't have to n't n't n

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Notice of 112 Incident and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the photographs of victimized police officers;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. On the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, the sentence identical to the order shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances: Defendant’s age, occupation, sex, family relationship, living environment, circumstances leading to the commission of the crime, and the circumstances after the commission of the crime.

- The Defendant, who took part in his wrong call, took a bath and took violence against the police officer, and the nature of the offense is bad.

- The injured police officers did not seek or agree on a letter.

- However, if the defendant has reached this court, the defendant's mistake was recognized.

- After 2001, he has been living without any particular criminal history.