However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 11, 2016, the Defendant was urged to return home from the slope E belonging to the Seongbuk-gu Police Station D, which was called to the site after receiving a report from the Defendant that the Defendant was frighting at the 'C' store located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, and received at around 23:30 on November 11, 2016, and was called to the site by the Defendant.

"........................, on the hand two times the right side of the above E, continued to be "Woo to be designated by the width," and the left face of the above E was set at one time.

As a result, the defendant assaulted police officers, thereby hindering police officers from performing their legitimate duties on the receipt of reports and the prevention of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommendation] There is no person [the person subject to special sentencing] in the basic area (from June to one year and six months] (the person subject to special sentencing] [the decision subject to sentencing] in consideration of the fact that the defendant is in depth against the defendant when committing the instant crime, and the fact that the defendant committed the instant crime contingently, etc., the sentence as set forth in the disposition shall be determined.