When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On October 13, 2017, around 11:59 around 11:59, the Defendant: (a) opened a door door-to-faceless driver’s seat of the FF freezing vehicle installed by the victim E; and (b) opened a door-to-faceless driver’s seat in the instant World Cup; and (c) opened a door-to-face of 5,000 won, owned by the victim E.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

2. On October 13, 2017, the Defendant: (a) opened a H restaurant parking lot located in G in the official city of Gongju on October 12:38, 2017; (b) opened a string door door door door of the J-type vehicle installed by the victim I; and (c) carried 800,000 won in cash, which is the victim’s possession, at the victim’s wall located in the contact head box.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each statement;

1. Each internal investigation report and each investigation report;

1. Application of the instant field photograph, each photograph description, photograph, CD 1 statute

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order (“The Defendant’s defense counsel asserted mental and physical weakness, and thus, the Defendant committed a crime by taking into account the surrounding area when theft was committed on the cater of a freezing tower. When the Defendant steals on the caterus vehicle, other vehicles than the open driving seat are parked on the cater, and the view of the view of the view of the view of the view of the view of the view of the view of the view of the vehicle. In this Court, the Defendant made a statement to the effect that “any other person’s money has been stolen, and any other person’s money has not been stolen.”

In light of the defendant's behavior and statement, although the defendant has a very low intellectual ability compared to the general public.

Even if the defendant at the time of the crime of this case, he/she has the ability or will to discern things due to mental disorder.