However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant committed the crime against the victim C, even though he did not have the intent or ability to pay the price even if he was given an order of alcohol and alcohol, on April 27, 2018, the Defendant ordered the victim to pay the price at the main point of “E” operated by the victim C at D at Pariju on April 27, 2018, by ordering the victim to pay the price. The Defendant acquired the victim with alcohol and alcohol equivalent to KRW 260,000 from the damaged person.

2. Notwithstanding the fact that the Defendant committed a crime against the Victim F did not have the intent or ability to pay the price even if he received an order of alcohol and alcohol, on April 28, 2018, the Defendant ordered the Victim F in G to pay the price at around 00:30 on April 28, 2018, and obtained the victim’s 5 Cerriju and paspo, and acquired the victim’s 100,000 won from the damaged person with the alcohol and spawn.

3. On April 28, 2018, the Defendant committed a crime against the victim I, even though he did not have the intent or ability to pay the consideration even if he used the taxi, the Defendant obtained the pecuniary benefit equivalent to the above amount by using a taxi to pay KRW 13,800,00 after having used the taxi to the YY Station located in the Sin-Eup located in the Sin-Eup located in the Sin-si in the Pakistan-si in the Sin-si in the Pakistan-si, and by not paying KRW 13,800 after having used the taxi.

4. The Defendant committed a crime against the Victim K, even though he did not have the intent or ability to pay the cost even if he used the taxi, said amount is equivalent to the above amount in a manner that, on April 30, 2018, the Defendant used the taxi to pay 60,000 won for the taxi and did not pay for the taxi fee after he/she used the taxi 50 U.S. Do 50 U.S. Do dong-si through the Gyeonggi-do dong-si. < Amended by Act No. 15314, Apr. 30, 2018>