When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person who sells a medical device under the trade name “C from North Korea-gu B and 2 level at Port.”

No person shall make a false or exaggerated advertisement about the name, manufacturing method, performance, efficacy, effect, or mechanism of a medical device in connection with an advertisement of a medical device.

Nevertheless, on October 26, 2016, the Defendant sold “D (Permission Number E)”, which is a medical device, at the above location. Although the efficacy permitted by the said medical machine authority is merely “easing the transit,” the efficacy is nothing more than that permitted by the said medical machine authority, and any other efficacy and effect is nothing more than that permitted, the Defendant’s advertisement of the product against an unspecified number of persons visiting the workplace would be somewhat weak for the efficacy and effect of the product when advertising the product.

Gas has a large amount of gas and a large amount of urines.

The head of the night shall be clear and clear.

All things are unblurd, kn't kn't.

Fire extinguishing is well-grounded and good.

It is necessary to terminate the open prohibition.

F, the F advertisedd the effect and effect of the medical device on the efficacy and effect of the medical device by advertising that the cell that is easy to be circulated as soon as possible.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. A written confirmation or accusation;

1. Recording prior to a summary;

1. The defendant asserts to the effect that the sales business of medical devices and the manufacture permit of medical devices [the defendant only knew about the experience effects of customers in the communication sources, and there were some horses of employees in the process, so it does not constitute an exaggerated advertisement under the Medical Devices Act.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined in this Court, namely, the Defendant, who is an unspecified number of people who visited the company while running business in the form of lecture room, product storage room, and medical device experience room with office.