A Imprisonment with prison labor of two years and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of eight months.

Defendant

A, on August 13, 1996, was sentenced to ten years of imprisonment for a violation of the Local Mental Drug Management Act by the Seoul High Court, and the sentence became final and conclusive on November 8 of the same year, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on July 3, 2007.

Defendant

B On November 9, 2011, the Incheon District Court sentenced one year of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Incheon District Court, and was released on May 25, 2012 during the execution of the sentence and passed on July 7, 2012.

[2017 Highest 201]

1. Defendant A is in the process of running a business where the amount of mission work funds is 50 billion won through the G church with the victim E and the victim F via the church pastor D around August 2008, which is the church pastor in Seoul and below, and when the completion of the work, it can be used for settling taxes and 25 billion won for the business.

After the completion of the work, the last day of the work is terminated if it is a third party, and this work is legitimate, but it is not possible to be exposed to the media or other people, so the former and present personnel of the National Assembly and the executives of the current foreign exchange bank, the member of the Suhyup and the executive members of the Agricultural Cooperatives are in progress, and the chairman is involved in the current diplomatic ambassador called the president.

There are machinery necessary for this work, with the price of KRW 150,000,000,000 is required, and 50% of the amount of the missionary work shall be paid, and the performance thereof shall also be made.

“The purpose of this is to make a false statement.”

However, the defendant A did not have been engaged in the work of bringing about KRW 50 billion from the mission fund and planned to use the amount received from the victims for the cost of the game development, so even if the victims received 50 billion money, there was no intention or ability to allow the victims to use 50% of the mission fund.

Nevertheless, Defendant A received KRW 47,000,000 from the victim E on August 13, 2008 from the victim E, from around the same year, from that time, Defendant A received KRW 47,00,000 from the Defendant’s agricultural bank account.

9.5. Until May, the victims shall be from the victims at least eight times in total, such as the list of crimes in the annexed list of crimes.