However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 11:50 on November 10, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The liquor tax item on the return plastic bags” is “the liquor tax on the return plastic bags,” while making a false statement to the effect that the Defendant would be “the statement on the return plastic bags,” to the victim C, who was receiving congratulatory money from the new father c by using a large gap in which the married guests died as a consequence of the receipt for the purpose of paying a stable.

However, in fact, the defendant was pretended to be a member of the marriage hall, and was not a member of the victim, but did not have been a member of the marriage hall.

As a result, the Defendant received three bags containing 10,000 won each of the answer money from the seat, and 30,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports and photographs attached thereto;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor, taking into account pertinent legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act and criminal records of the same kind;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds that the defendant agreed with the

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc.;