2. The judgment is recognized that the defendant is both the time of committing the crime and reflects the truth in depth, and that part of the crime is about attempted crimes, and that the victims and the victims have agreed to do so smoothly.

However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the instant crime committed repeatedly against the reduction of the penalty amount, and subsequent to the Defendant’s repeated release, the head of the above reduction of the penalty amount was found to have committed the crime of fraud; (b) there is a significant nature of such crime; (c) the Defendant has been sentenced five times a sentence due to fraud; (d) some of the instant crimes constitute repeated crimes; (e) there is no special circumstance to change the sentence of the lower court in the first instance trial; and (e) other circumstances that are the condition for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s career, family relationship, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition, since the defendant's appeal is without merit.