교통사고처리특례법위반등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
[2014 Highest 518] The Defendant, who is engaged in driving of B Poter Cargo Vehicles, driven the said car without a driver’s license on April 30, 2014, led the Defendant to drive the said car on the 13:40th of April, 2014, in a case of permanent residence, the intersection of the private distance of 34 in front of the 16th of the Pung-ro, Pung-ro, Gung-ro, 16th of the
Since there is an intersection at the time, the driver of a motor vehicle is responsible for the negligence that the defendant neglected his/her duty of care to reduce the speed prior to entering the intersection and to prevent the accident by safely driving by checking well the right and the right and the right and the right of the road, and the driver of a motor vehicle was responsible for the negligence that the defendant proceeds as it is while neglecting the duty of care to prevent the accident.
After all, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, injury to the victim C, such as scarf and scarf, etc. requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment, injury to the victim E (the 52 years old), who is the passenger of the victimized vehicle, for approximately four weeks of medical treatment, injury to the body part of the body part of the body part, other than the body part of the body part of the 2-day back back back and the body part of the body part of the victim F (the 56 years old), and injury to the son F (the son, the son) requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment
[2014Kadan735] Around September 17, 2014, the Defendant, without any justifiable reason, committed an assault to the staff of the H Hospital located in G during permanent residence on September 1, 2014, by assaulting the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of reports by assaulting, such as: (a) the Defendant, who was dispatched after receiving a report from the staff, to avoid disturbance; and (b) the developments leading up to the permanent police station I district of the permanent police station called the Defendant; (c) “I have been the police officer; (d) I have been said to have been said to have been doing so; and (e) I have been said to have been able to take down the dub of the said J, and cut off the front of the police uniforms, and thus interfered with the police officer’s lawful performance of duties.
Summary of Evidence
[2014 Highest 518]
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Traffic accident report, ..