Also, D’s statement is credibility even in light of the following: (a) the Defendant reported in 112 that the Defendant her gate was sealed by the Defendant; (b) the Defendant and D stated that all police officers dispatched upon the above report were assaulted by each other; (c) D was a summary indictment on the ground that the Defendant abused the Defendant; and (d) the Defendant’s lower part of the steel gate’s upper part of the steel gate was just directed towards the Defendant, and (c) it is natural for the lower part of the steel gate to D.

On the other hand, since police officers dispatched to the site did not properly examine the status of D's bridge, it is not possible to determine the credibility of D's statement based on the testimony of the above police officers.

Nevertheless, the court below found the defendant not guilty on the ground that it did not believe D's statement, and that police officers dispatched to the site failed to discover D's superior status, etc., and thus, it failed to prove the facts charged. The court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles, thereby affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Around 22:00 on October 12, 2012, the summary of the facts charged in the instant case: (a) the Defendant: (b) the Defendant: (c) the Defendant: (a) committed assault to D around the Geum-gu Busan Fransh parking lot to prevent the entrance of the parking lot with the iron gate; (b) caused knee to knee kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne knes; and (c) kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne, which requires approximately two weeks’ treatment.

3. The judgment of the court below

A. The instant case.