A. The Plaintiff, along with her husband C, engages in the retail business of steel products with the trade name of E in the Full-si D market in Jeonju-si, Jeonju-si, and the Defendant engages in the business of selling iron products with the trade name of F at a place adjacent to the said iron shop.

B. Around March 2015, the Defendant filed a petition with an investigative agency that the Plaintiff received false basic supply benefits. On September 10, 2015, the Plaintiff was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for imprisonment with prison labor for the same criminal facts (violation of the National Basic Living Security Act) as stated below on the following grounds on September 10, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive.

The Plaintiff was selected as a basic recipient from October 201, 208 at the Seo-gu Daejeon metropolitan community service center and received basic wages. From January 2010 to August 20, 2014, the Plaintiff was 24,694,160 won in total of basic wages by deception or other unjust means, even though de facto marriage with C was changed in the area of residence and household structure, the employee in charge of the community service center was able to be married with the employee in charge of the Daejeon metropolitan community service center from January 20, 2010, and received 86,970 won in basic wages around January 20, 2010, from August 20, 2014.

C. The Plaintiff and the Defendant aggravated the relationship due to the same case as the above Paragraph b above.

In such process, the plaintiff and C filed a complaint with the investigative agency that the defendant injured the plaintiff and C's honor and insultd the plaintiff and C. On October 26, 2016, the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for not less than four months for the criminal facts that the plaintiff and C damaged the plaintiff and C's honor and insultd the plaintiff and C as the court 2015 Godan1911.

On June 29, 2017, the defendant appealed against the above criminal judgment of the court of first instance, and the appellate court (this court No. 2016No1569) sentenced the defendant to a suspended sentence for a period of four months for the following criminal facts.

The defendant is dissatisfied with the above appellate judgment.