The request of the applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

On April 5, 2016, the Defendant paid money to the victim C at the E golf shop located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, by means of paying the card at the golf shop run by the victim when the card limit is recovered.

The phrase “(200,000 won)” was made to the effect that it was “.”.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any property as a bad credit, and did not pay taxes and fines properly, and even if he borrowed money from the injured party, he did not have any intent or ability to pay such money.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, borrowed 200,000 won from the victim and acquired 20,000 won from the victim, and received 32,839,300 won or pecuniary gains over 45 times as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. Some statements made to the accused in the protocol of interrogation of the suspect against the prosecution;

1. Partial statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol of each police officer against the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Details of card use, remittance statement, statement of account transactions in foreign exchange bank accounts under the name of the F who used the suspect, and the direct cash payment statement;

1. Investigative reports (verification of credit information as a suspect), age, credit information replies;

1. A report on investigation (attaching details of taxes in arrears);

1. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, the Defendant’s intent of deception and deception is sufficiently recognized.

① The victim C will pay the Defendant a loan to the Defendant on the security of the divided apartment as stated in the list of crimes in attached Form C from the investigative agency to this court, or use it as expenses incurred in conducting bond business.