However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Obstruction of business;

A. On April 21, 2016, around 13:00, the Defendant: (a) entered a D restaurant operated by Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City B Victim C (Inn, 49 years of age) with the influence of alcohol; (b) obstructed the victim’s operation of the coffee shop by drinking the horses to customers; and (c) making time fees.

B. On April 21, 2016, around 19:50, the Defendant interfered with the operation of the coffee shop by allowing the injured party to take a bath to the customers, such as taking a breab while drunk in the G coffee shop operated by the Jung-gu Incheon E victim F (29 tax).

2. 모욕 피고인은 위 1 항과 같은 일시, 장소에서 112 신고를 받고 출동한 인천 중부 경찰서 H 파출소 소속 경찰관 피해자 I( 여, 32세 )에게 위 1 항 기재 커피숍 업주와 다른 상인들이 있는 가운데 " 씨발 년 아, 좆같은 년 아, 죽여 버리겠다, 머리 통을 부숴 버리겠다.

"Publicly insulting the victim by referring " such as "".

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to I and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes in writing C;

1. Articles 314(1) and 311 of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with each business) concerning the facts constituting an offense and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for each of the aforementioned Articles;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (such as the fact that there is no record of committing a crime heavier than punishment, and the fact that one's mistake is repented and reflected in depth).