손해배상(기)
1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff and the Defendants are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.
3. Text of the judgment of the court of first instance;
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for addition or dismissal as stated in Paragraph 2 below, and therefore, it is identical to the reasoning of the court's decision of the first instance. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. The addition or dismissal of the part of the judgment of the court of first instance refers to “the relationship between the parties.” of the second “1. Basic Facts” of the judgment of the court of first instance, “the Korean Reporting Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant”)” is “the Korean Reporting Co., Ltd., Ltd. (the administrator of the Korean Reporting Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Rehabilitation Obligor”)
(f) On January 29, 2015, the Seoul Central District Court 2013 Ma1422 and January 5, 2016, when the rehabilitation proceedings were concluded on January 29, 2015 (Seoul Central District Court 2013 Ma142), the debtor corporation, the debtor corporation, and the debtor corporation, taking over B’s lawsuit against the debtor corporation, the debtor corporation, on January 5, 2016.
The term "O" in the 10th sentence of the first instance court shall be deemed to be "AB", and the term "AC" shall be deemed to be "D".
3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and all appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendants are dismissed as it is without merit. However, according to the lawsuit acceptance by the defendant Japan, the part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the administrator B by the defendant Debtor Rehabilitation Debtor, Ltd. in the judgment of the court of