Examining the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court and the first instance court, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the Defendant was guilty of the facts charged in this case on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

In doing so, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of free evaluation due to violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the publication of false facts under the Act on Entrusted Elections, such as public organizations, etc.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.