beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.05.24 2013노1096

특수절도등

Text

All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is an unreasonable sentencing. 2. The judgment of this court is based on the summary of the grounds for appeal. Although the defendants are divided in depth, the victims’ economic damage was practically recovered and the victims did not want to punish Defendant A, Defendant B has repeatedly committed the crimes of this case during the period of repeated crime of the same kind of crime. Defendant A had the record of repeatedly committing the crimes of this case, and Defendant A has the record of being sentenced to suspended sentence due to a similar type of crime, and other various circumstances, including the defendants’ age, character, character, environment, family relationship, motive for each of the crimes of this case, circumstances before and after the crime, and risk of recidivism, etc., the first instance court's sentence imposed on the defendants within the scope of the sentencing sentencing guidelines (in particular, the lowest sentence with respect to Defendant B) is too unfair, each of the above arguments by the defendants cannot be accepted.

3. According to the conclusion, the Defendants’ appeals cannot be accepted in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.