Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

A. Although the Defendant did not assault the police officer G, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case. The lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The Defendant, by mistake of facts or misapprehension of legal principles, resisted to illegally arrest the Defendant without complying with the doctrine, even though the instant crime was committed because the police officer failed to establish the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties or constitutes self-defense, and thus, constitutes a crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant charges.

Therefore, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles on the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties or self-defense, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

C. The lower court’s sentence of eight months of imprisonment, two years of suspended sentence, and one hundred and twenty hours of community service order, which was sentenced to the Defendant, is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 사실오인 주장에 관한 판단 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음 사정들, 즉, ① 경찰공무원 G은 수사기관에서부터 원심 법정에 이르기까지 ‘I와 함께 피고인을 순찰차에 태우던 중 피고인이 강하게 저항하면서 다리를 차안으로 넣지 않았고, 자신이 순찰차 밖에서 피고인의 발을 손으로 잡아 순찰차 안으로 집어넣자 피고인이 발을 다시 순찰차 밖으로 내미는 것을 여러 차례 반복하던 중 피고인이 자신의 턱 부위를 무릎으로 차고, 허벅지를 발로 찼다’는 취지로 진술하였던바(수사기록 제23, 24면, 공판기록 제81~84면), 이러한 진술은 구체적이고, 일관되어 이를 충분히 신빙할 수 있고, 달리 G이 피고인에게 불리하도록 허위의 진술을 하였다고 볼만한 특별한...