beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.04.26 2016가단510460

손해배상(의)

Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 1 million for each of the Plaintiff A and the Plaintiff B; and (b) KRW 5,909,200 for each of the Plaintiff C and each of them on August 30, 2015.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant is an operator of the F Hospital located in the wife population (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”), and G is a nurse working in the Defendant Hospital.

Plaintiff

C was the Plaintiff’s parent of Plaintiff A and B, and the Plaintiff was the Plaintiff’s parent of Plaintiff C.

B. Around 4:00 on August 30, 2015, Plaintiff C visited the emergency room of the Defendant hospital due to a heat resistant symptoms, and the Plaintiff visited the emergency room of the Defendant hospital. The medical personnel of the Defendant hospital for the purpose of piracy treatment, respectively, prescribed typhphical, fpalphal, and DNA (DICKNL), and took the dICNL injection, and then returned to the Defendant hospital at around 5:0 on the same day.

C. The Plaintiff C visited the emergency room of the Defendant hospital at the end of 20:00 on the same day as the date when the symptoms were not recovered even after the Defendant hospital was discharged, and the medical professionals of the Defendant hospital visited the emergency room of the Defendant hospital at the end of 20:0. The medical professionals of the Defendant hospital determined to be exposed to typical typical drugs and dyp fest f

The nurse G of the Defendant Hospital, who received the instruction of the medical staff of the Defendant Hospital, administered the Plaintiff’s DNA play injection (hereinafter “the instant injection medication”), and immediately after the administration, the Plaintiff C began to feel the leg pain.

E. Since then, Plaintiff C was subject to an examination of the pain on the left-hand side and the vegetable hyetrophosis in the Defendant hospital’s outpatient treatment, and as a result, it was confirmed that Plaintiff C’s left-hand B’s balerogate was not transmitted to Plaintiff C.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant eromatic damage”). [Grounds for recognition] A without dispute, entry of evidence Nos. 1 through 5, and the purport of the entire pleadings

2. In order to hold the medical personnel liable for tort due to the medical personnel's breach of the duty of care in medical practice, there should be proof that there is a breach of the duty of care in medical practice, the occurrence of damages, and the causal relationship between them, and the risk according to the patient's specific symptoms or circumstances due to the nature of medical practice