However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

피고인은 2010년경부터 일정한 주거나 직업 없이 전국을 떠돌아다니며 생활하던 중, 2013. 9. 17. 00:50경 충남 금산군 C에 있는 피해자 D의 깻잎 작업장 앞길에서, 피해자 소유인 시가 200만 원 상당의 E 포터 화물차의 창문이 내려져 있고 위 차량의 키박스에 열쇠가 꽂혀 있는 것을 발견하고, 피해자가 위 작업장에서 일을 하고 있어 감시가 소홀한 틈을 타 위 차량에 승차하여 위 열쇠로 시동을 걸고 위 차량을 운전하여 갔다.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (Attachment of photographs of damaged vehicles);

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (excluding the fact that the truck of stolen cargo has been returned to the victim, the theft committed around September 6, 2013 and the past record of the suspension of indictment on September 27, 2013, which was issued on the suspension of execution, has no particular criminal records for the last 15 years, and the motive and circumstance of the crime, reflectivity, etc. shall be considered);