강간치상
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) is that the sentence of the lower court (an order to suspend the execution of imprisonment of two years and six months, and an order to attend a sexual assault treatment lecture for 40 hours) is too uneasible and unreasonable.
2. There is no change in the terms and conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court, and where the sentencing of the first instance does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect such a case (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). Based on the foregoing legal doctrine, there is no change in the sentencing conditions compared with the lower court’s judgment because new materials on sentencing have not been submitted in the trial, and considering the factors revealed in the arguments in the instant case, the lower court’s sentencing was too unfilled and exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.
It does not appear.
The prosecutor's improper argument in sentencing is without merit.
3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is without merit and is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.