견책처분취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff was appointed to a fire assistant on March 30, 1982 and promoted to a fire assistant on July 10, 2008, and served as the informatization officer of the National Emergency Management Agency from July 22, 201 to March 22, 2012, and served as the head of the National Emergency Management Agency from December 27, 2012.
B. On June 24, 2014, the Defendant issued a reprimand (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff for the following reasons pursuant to Articles 56, 63, and 78(1) of the State Public Officials Act.
1.(a)
On February 24, 2012, at the Japanese colonial house near the Dar basin located in Dong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Dong-gu, Incheon. In fact, E did not demand or implement cash of KRW 3 million to E fire-fighting boat F, thereby leading F to the G fire-fighting school, and there was no fact that F did not have conducted the lowest performance evaluation, and for this reason, F did not have discussed the Plaintiff’s complaint;
(b) there was no entertainment entertainment in a high-class restaurant after the funeral ceremony of the head of the H Fire Safety Headquarters I or any disbursement of the budget throughout several months in order to handle the expenses in the J Fire Fighting Team; and
C. Despite the fact that E did not cancel most official schedule for golf or golf in the end of September 2010 of the World Fire-Fighting Center Games, there was an injury to E by openly pointing out false facts by openly making a talk with the Plaintiff, who was the head of the LM fire-fighting headquarters at the time of the decline in promotion examination.
(1) On March 25, 2012, the Plaintiff’s house located in Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, N apartment around March 25, 2012, the reason related to paragraph (1)(a) was “the ground for the first disciplinary action,” “the ground for the second disciplinary action,” “the ground for the second disciplinary action,” and the reason for paragraph (b)(c) of the same Article, and the facts were not true that Q Q Q Q from a mother-friendly funeral hall of the head of the O chief of the fire station did not come into contact with, or from E’s house, and even if this did not result in the promotion of P, it was called to the above M.