However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around April 2014, 25, the Defendant violated the Trademark Act due to the sale of forged clothes attached to a trademark, the trademark right holder’s trademark infringement was committed by selling KRW 47,500, 1,000, 100 among the Defendant’s dwelling in Daegu-gu, Seo-gu, 109 Dong 1206, and 1206, “C” (registration number 380952) registered with the Korean Intellectual Property Office on Nov. 5, 1997; the trademark right holder’s infringement of the trademark right due to possession of forged clothes attached to a trademark; the trademark holder’s infringement of the trademark right holder’s trademark infringement of KRW 36,00,00, 200, 2000, 2000, 36,000, 25,000 won attached to the Korean Intellectual Property Office on Feb. 18, 2014 (registration number 38, 2016).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Screening pictures by capturing the Internet site;

1. The screen after a Kakaf course is cut;

1. Screenings by capturing a delivery product;

1. Results of appraisal;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Expert opinion;

1. Application of the statutes of the original trademark register;

1. Article 93 of the Trademark Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Do1148, Apr. 1, 2011; Supreme Court Decision 201Do1248, Apr. 1, 201

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 97-2 (1) of the Trademark Act that is confiscated;