beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원강릉지원 2017.07.12 2015가단22492

손해배상(자)

Text

1. The Defendant: KRW 42,762,566; KRW 1,00,00 for Plaintiff B; and KRW 500,000 for Plaintiff C and D, respectively.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Basic facts 1) E is a Fpoter car on April 14, 2015 (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) around 09:40 on April 14, 2015.

(i)A G-wheeled vehicle (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff-motor vehicle”) on the opposite side of the G-wheeled vehicle (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff-motor vehicle”) by a negligence in violation of the signal, appearing straight along the two-lane distance from the eths of the ethic distance to the ethic distance between three laness;

) On the sign that the left and left-hand turn turn signal can be given, the Plaintiff A received an internship from the Plaintiff, and caused the Plaintiff A to suffer injury, such as the closed frame of the bones of the sacrife (sacrife) (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”).

2) As to the situation at the time of the accident, the Plaintiff stated at the investigative agency that “I would like to enter a one-lane for the U-turn and stop for the left-hand turn, and after entering the left-hand turn, I would like to confirm the fact that I came to the left-hand turn, and plicked it on the left-hand,” and “I would like to see the signal, etc. at the time of the turn-on to the left-hand, etc., and there is no conviction that the Defendant considered the low-day sailing length signal. I stated that I would like to see that I would have entered the yellow light, etc., and I would like to see that H, the driver of the second-class vehicle, who was waiting to turn to the left-hand in the same direction as the Plaintiff’s vehicle, was waiting to change the signal while the vehicle in front was waiting to turn to the left-hand turn, and that I would go in the straight-on line while waiting for the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front.”

The specific situation at the time of the accident of this case is as follows.

3. Plaintiff B’s wife, Plaintiff C, and D are children of Plaintiff A, and the Defendant is subject to E.