beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.11.18 2015고정1239

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 4,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The Defendants are operating illegal sexual traffic businesses in the name of "D" with four rooms with simple intrusions in C and C, two rooms with shower facilities, one waiting room for employees, and four CCTVs.

The Defendants conspiredd to visit the above business establishment around 22:00 on April 6, 2015, and assisted F, female employees, to engage in sexual intercourse, etc. in the business of arranging sexual intercourse between September 22, 2014 and April 6, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements and their defense counsel asserts that Defendant B did not assist in arranging acts of arranging commercial sex acts, etc. in collaboration with Defendant A.

The following circumstances acknowledged by the following evidence, i.e., the Defendants: (a) Defendant B, who was a person in a marital relationship, has made a lease contract and business registration under his/her name for Defendant A; (b) Defendant A’s business establishment; (c) Defendant A’s business establishment; (d) Defendant B’s business establishment; (e) Defendant A’s business establishment; (e) October 1, 2014; and (e) February 23, 2015;

3. Each of the 1.50,000 won is indicated in the records, ③ Defendant A engaged in a business with the investigative agency, Defendant B, and Defendant B made a statement to the effect that Defendant B had an intention to carry out his/her business with almost the same life as that of himself/herself, ④ Defendant B was also in the investigative agency, and Defendant B was aware of the fact that Defendant A had an intention to carry out his/her commercial sex acts at the time, and was in his/her name registered business or entered into a lease agreement with Defendant A, including aiding and abetting at the time of repair of water and doors, and was stated to the effect that Defendant A had an assistance in carrying out his/her commercial sex acts.