Chapter 8 (No. 1) of the unit price table seized, Chapter 27 (No. 2) of the 1900,000 won.

The defendant purchased mobile phone equipment from taxi professionals in the taxi and sold them to acquire profits.

On April 2015, the Defendant purchased 41 cell phone numbers owned by victims over 41 times from the end of February 2015 to April 25, 2015, with the knowledge of the fact that the victim D was a stolen of 1,50,000 won at the market price of 1,000 Aphone6 mobile phone numbers acquired by the taxi engineer, who was employed by the victim D in his/her own taxi in the second two kinds of taxi streets located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and acquired stolen goods, even though he/she was aware of the fact that the victim was a stolen.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Copy of each protocol of suspect suspect of the police against E;

1. Copy of the statement made to D by the police;

1. Each police seizure protocol or a copy thereof;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of the investigation report (on-site seized articles);

1. Relevant Articles 362(1) and 362(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the aggravated punishment provided for in the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (the aggravated punishment for concurrent crimes with the punishment stipulated in subparagraph 12 above a year in the list of crimes of the most severe annexed crimes);

1. Article 48 (1) 1 and 2 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. Circumstances favorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 333 (1) of the Return Criminal Procedure Act: The fact that stolens that are damaged goods have been seized, the defendant has no record of punishment exceeding the fine: The fact that there exists a record of having been punished for the same kind of crime under the same Act, and that there are many frequency of crimes and the quantity of stolen goods acquired;