산업안전보건법위반등
Defendants shall be punished by a fine of five million won.
Defendant
A and B fail to pay each of the above fines.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
D Co., Ltd. is a business owner who is located in Pyeongtaek-si E and has been established for the purpose of painting construction business, etc. on November 1, 2018 and has received from C Co., Ltd. the “Seosung Factory Extension Corporation” for the construction cost of KRW 38 million.
Defendant
A is a field safety manager for the extension work site of D Co., Ltd.
Defendant
C A corporation is established for the purpose of building construction business, etc. at Ansan-si, and around September 1, 2018, it is the business owner who received construction cost KRW 1.31 billion from G to G for the “Neong-si Factory Extension Project” from G for the purpose of construction business.
Defendant
B is the head of the site of the C Co., Ltd. who is in charge of safety management of the contractor's workers as well as his employees at the construction site.
1. On December 28, 2018, Defendants A and B ordered victims I (the male and the age of 56) to work for steel-frame-resistant steel resistant in the three-story laboratory located in the G Ansung Factory Extension Corporation, Inc., Ltd., G Ansung-si, G Ansung-si, Inc., Ltd., which was located in F in Ansan-si, A, at the third floor of the same time.
When an employee boards a mobile vision and engages in painting work, he/she shall install the highest safety gap at the top part to prevent the fall of the employee, and has a duty of care to manage and supervise the safety cap properly.
Nevertheless, at around 15:40 on December 28, 2018, the Defendants confirmed that the victim was out of the safety appearance on the grounds that the victim satisf was heated and heated in the safety appearance, and neglected it as it is. Moreover, the Defendants, by negligence, who did not install a safe distance in the non-system, caused the victim to fall into vaddddd by falling into vaddddddddd, when the victim was moving out from the mobile satis.
Ultimately, the Defendants jointly do so to the victim due to the above occupational negligence.