As a result, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as the definite base, which requires a medical treatment for about 21 days.

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, it is difficult to believe that C’s statement that corresponds to the facts charged in the instant case is difficult, and the other evidence presented by the prosecutor alone, which led to the Defendant’s destruction of the c’s dubage.

It is insufficient to recognize that C has suffered injury or injury.

① On March 20, 2018, C stated that the police unilaterally flapsed and sponsed the Defendant, and that he was not flabed.

C On June 8, 2018, the police again stated that the defendant had flabed his fat, and that he had flabed his arms and flabs.

C stated in this court that the Defendant was sprinking and sprinking his flab, and that he was sprinking his own arms, and that he was not flabing the Defendant’s flab, and that he was not able to take the Defendant’s bath.

However, D, a witness of the dispute between the defendant and C, first of all, took the bath of C, and stated that C was unable to witness C’s flab, and the defendant was unable to witness C’s bat.

D does not seem to have any particular interest or relationship with a defendant or C, and it is relatively objective to determine that the defendant or C is in a relatively objective position, and there is no other circumstance to reject the credibility of the statement.

Since the statement of C on the defendant or his own act is insufficient in consistency and contradictory to the statement of D, it is difficult to believe it easily.

(2) C shall be in need of three weeks of medical treatment due to the act of the defendant.