Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

On August 26, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 21:20 on August 26, 2015, the Defendant was living together with the Defendant, and (b) around 63 years old, Busan Southern-gu D29, where the Defendant was living together with the Defendant, and (c) was found to have defects in kis

The horses were cut at the end, and “I am Chewing, I am gue, I am immediately living.”

“In the context of the victim’s housing, the victim’s housing was invaded by the victim’s breath and booming method.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s legal statement [the Defendant only entered the instant residence, and did not have entered the said residence against the victim’s will] The application of the law is acknowledged in full view of the following: (a) the facts acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court; (b) the victim stated to the effect that “the Defendant, who intends to enter the house at the time, was “ well-known,” and (c) he was made within the room, and was made a statement to the police that “it was inevitable to make a report because he did not go to the police because he did not go to the house,” and (d) the Defendant’s statement was sufficiently reliable in light of the content of the statement or the attitude that he did not wish to punish the victim; and (b) the fact that the Defendant was entering the victim’s residence against the victim

1. Relevant Article 319 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act involving Costs of Trial;