In full view of the purport and contents of the relevant provisions of the former Ship Safety Act (amended by Act No. 1299, Jan. 6, 2015), the lower court: (a) based on the following: (b) based on the fact that, in the event that a false pass certificate, etc. is issued at an excellent maintenance business establishment, the Korean corporation’s advance payment, etc., trust the outcome of the inspection and bound to issue the ship inspection certificate; (c) the Defendants pretended that the Defendants were normally engaged in F inspection at G, the excellent maintenance business establishment, and thereby interfered with the vessel inspection management, which

The decision was determined.

Examining the relevant legal principles and the evidence duly admitted by the court below, the above determination by the court below is just, and there is no error of exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or of misapprehending the legal principles on the obstruction of business.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.