A. On January 27, 2016, Defendant A (1) did not prepare and submit a complaint stating that “E returned to the village residents, such as the head of the village, and the parent of the new Defendant went back by using the Act on Special Cases, thereby impairing the honor of the parent of the deceased Defendant.”

However, in fact, E did not have a flicker with the parent of the defendant who took advantage of the special assistance or acquired the land by fraud.

Accordingly, the defendant submitted a false complaint to an investigative agency for the purpose of having E receive criminal or disciplinary punishment.

(2) On April 28, 2016, the Defendant violated his residence by entering the victim’s house via an open gate, despite the fact that the victim’s explicit rejection was made on the ground that the victim’s house F was to perform the construction of boundary repair work for the Defendant, and that the victim’s explicit rejection was made, the Defendant infringed upon the victim’s residence.

B. On April 2016, Defendant B, along with G, her relatives, laid off a wall equivalent to KRW 347,50,00 of the market price of the victim’s possession of the wall on the ground that the victim had installed the wall at his own discretion, at a location where the Defendant’s house and the house of the Defendant’s house located in H located in the Northwest-gun of the former Northwest-gun of the Republic of Korea, located within the boundary of the Defendant’s house located in the Northwest-gun of the former Northwest-gun of the Republic of Korea, for several years prior to the dispute regarding land issues, even though the dispute occurred, and the victim installed the wall at his own discretion.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with G, damaged the victim's property.

2. The judgment on Defendant B is at the location where the boundary dispute between the neighboring victim A and the neighboring victim A came to the place of residence of the Defendant at the existing fence.