2. The judgment of the court below is based on the following facts: (a) the Defendant repeatedly imprisoned the instant crime without awareness of the crime even though he had multiple criminal records, such as having been punished four times due to the larceny; (b) the escape from the violation of the Military Service Act due to the violation of the Military Service Act, and applied for the re-issuance of another person’s resident registration certificate using his photograph, etc.; (c) the nature of the crime and the criminal circumstances are very inappropriate in light of the law and habituality of the crime; (d) the victims have not agreed with the victim; and (e) other various sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, happiness and family environment; and (e) the circumstances before and after the crime.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.