도로교통법위반(무면허운전)
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (for four months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and forty hours of order to attend a law enforcement lecture) is too uneased and unreasonable.
2. In full view of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant has a number of times punishment for the same crime, etc., which are disadvantageous to the defendant, the fact that the defendant reflects the defendant, and the fact that the defendant has no record of punishment exceeding the fine, and other factors of sentencing indicated in the record, such as the defendant’s age, health, occupation, sex, sex, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, etc., it is difficult to view that the sentence of the court below is too un
Therefore, the prosecutor's above assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.