A. 1) F is the G Poter Cargo (hereinafter “Defendant Vehicle”) around September 8, 2015, around 20:20, around September 5, 2015.

) H (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) who was driving at the edge of a Mad Road while by driving a vehicle to make a bypass the intersection of the site third distance from the budget to the Yancheon-ri, Y (hereinafter referred to as “the network”).

(2) On October 3, 2015, the part on the left-hand hand of the driver’s I TWT 100 Oral Bab was taken as part on the part on the part on which the deceased was on the left-hand hand of the said cargo, and caused the deceased to have his her son died of the flabing bladrosis at around 11:20 on October 3, 2015 (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) The Plaintiff A is the deceased’s wife, and the rest of the Plaintiffs are the deceased’s children, and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract regarding the Defendant’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1-3, 8-12 evidence, Eul 2 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the recognition of liability and the recognition of the above limitation, the defendant is liable for the damage caused by the death of the deceased due to the instant accident as the insurer of the defendant vehicle.

다만, 망인은 이 사건 사고 당시 안전모를 착용하고는 있었으나, 턱끈이 없는 안전모였거나, 턱끈을 완전히 고정하지 아니하였음을 추단할 수 있는 점(갑 8호증의 3 참조), 설령 원고들 주장과 같이 망인의 오토바이가 ‘자동차’에 해당하지 않아 망인이 도로교통법상의 갓길통행금지의무를 위반한 것은 아니라 하더라도 망인도 교통정리를 하고 있지 않은 교차로에 진입하면서 전방 및 좌우를 잘 살펴 안전함을 확인하고 서행하여야 할 주의의무가 있음에도 이를 게을리한 채 그대로 진행하여 교차로에서 먼저 우회전한 피고 차량의 적재함 우측 끝 모서리 부근을 추돌한 과실이 있고, 이러한 과실이 이 사건 사고의 발생 및 손해의...