2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence examined by the court below, namely, the victim’s specific and consistent statement from the investigative agency to the court below, the victim’s father E, and the defendant stated that the victim was a witness of assaulting the victim, and the victim received medical treatment in the emergency room immediately after the victim was damaged, and stated that the victim was faced with face at the time in the first medical records in the emergency room, the defendant may sufficiently recognize the facts of assaulting the victim as stated in the facts constituting the crime of the court below.

The lower court did not err by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the judgment.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is groundless.