beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.04.07 2020고단391

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, from the beginning of August 2019 to September 22:35, 2019, had four marina rooms and one shower room in the “C” business located in the B B B of Osan-si, Osan-si, and arranged commercial sex acts by providing the said business with 1.2 thousand won for male customers visiting the said business place and providing them with a guest room, leading them to the sexual intercourse with those of female employees who are not infinite in name.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The list of seized articles, records of seizure and the list of seized articles;

1. Recording files for internal investigation reports;

1. Application of investigative reports (Calculation of Suspect A Criminal Proceeds) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of a fine concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The former part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. The latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic (excluding the collection of an amount equivalent to the seized money and articles within the scope of collection);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order reflects the defendant's mistake while recognizing the crime; the defendant has no criminal records that exceed the same criminal records and fines; the defendant does not operate the above business in the future; and the defendant's business size and business period; the defendant's criminal records; his criminal records; his age, character and conduct; and various conditions of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case are considered.