However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a low-speed vehicle B.

At around 22:50 on May 27, 2013, the Defendant driven the aforesaid 71-129 LH apartment 3 complex in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, and led Cheongra to proceed from the room of the apartment.

Since the location is where signal, etc. is installed, the driver has a duty of care to drive safely in accordance with the new subparagraph, but at the time, the defendant was negligent in driving the same intersection without disregarding the signal of the defendant's moving direction at the time, and the defendant shocked the victim C(30 years old) driver's fronter on the right side of the defendant's vehicle in the case of the victim C(30 years old) driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver'

As a result, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, committed an injury to the victim E (V, 27 years of age) who was on board the victim C and the said part of the said part of the vehicle, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, suffered injury to the victim F (6 years of age) and the victim G (3 years of age) who was on board the stove vehicle, such as the two stoves, in need of medical treatment for about one week, respectively, and escaped without stopping the stove vehicle to cause damage to KRW 15,898,220 of the repair cost and immediately stopping the vehicle to the victim E (15,89,220 of the repair cost).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each written diagnosis and written estimate;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime by applicable law;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Discretionary mitigation is favorable to the defendant among the reasons for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act.