아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(강제추행)
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
At around 11:00 on June 4, 2019, the Defendant: (a) on board a police line with the central line line of Gyeonggi-gu, Yangyang-gun, Yangyang-si, Yangyang-gu, Yangyang-si; (b) on the one hand, on the other, on the one hand, on the other, on the one hand, the victim B (the other, the other, the other, the 14 years old), the other, and the other, on the other hand, on the other, on the one hand, on the one hand, on the one hand, the other,
The Defendant told the victim and the first son and the second son and son, “Mever male and female,” and the victim sawed as “Mever female, her only,” and made the victim her “Mever,” and her own hand, her indecent act by force against the victim, who is a child, by making the victim her chest her own hand.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant's legal statement (the third trial date);
1. C’s legal statement;
1. The statement of the victim recorded in the video CD;
1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on photographs by cutting a CCTV image image in the old river basin, two copies of a written confirmation, and capturing a DNA;
1. Article 7 (3) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse and Article 298 of the Criminal Act, which select the relevant criminal facts and punishment;
1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. Article 21 (2) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse;
1. Article 56 (1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, Article 2 of the Addenda to Act on Welfare of Persons with Disabilities (Act No. 15904, Dec. 11, 2018); Article 59-3 (1) of the Act on Welfare of Persons with Disabilities;
1. It is difficult to readily conclude that a defendant is in danger of re-offending of a sexual crime due to the absence of a criminal record identical to that of the defendant, exempted from an order to disclose or notify information, and the fact that an order to attend a course, an order to restrict employment, or registration of personal information appears to have the effect of preventing such re-offending, and other social benefits expected by an order to disclose or notify information and the prevention of sexual crimes.