2. The judgment of the court below did not have favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant led to the confession of each of the crimes of this case and the defendant's health and economic conditions are not good. However, even though the defendant had a record of punishment more than 10 times, he interfered with the victim D's business by force, and spread a much much more than her age to police officers than her age, and the risk of recidivism is very poor, and the risk of recidivism is very high, and there is a concern that the defendant made efforts to receive a letter from the damaged police officer, and there is no circumstance that the court below reduced the fine amount of the summary order (2 million won) by taking account of the above favorable circumstances. However, considering the above favorable circumstances, the court below's decision did not change any circumstances that could give special consideration to sentencing, and considering the motive and circumstances of the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character, and environment, the punishment conditions of the crime of this case, as well as the punishment conditions in this case are considered.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.