A Imprisonment for six months, Defendant B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

except that from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

A, B, and C have purchased at least two teaching life insurance products through F, which had been employed as an insurance solicitor at the G branch from July 1, 1995 to July 1, 2001, respectively, through F, which had been employed as an insurance solicitor at the G branch from the G branch of the school life-related G branch. According to the insurance policy, in the event of hospitalization for treatment due to disease under the insurance policy, hospitalization insurance money, health care benefit, etc. are paid, and in the event of re-hospitalization of the same disease with the lapse of 180 days after the discharge, insurance money shall be paid by 120 days after the discharge; however, in the event of hospitalization of another disease, insurance money shall not be paid; however, in the event of re-hospitalize of the same disease with the lapse of the period of 180 days, insurance money shall be paid by 120 days after the expiration of the period of absence, even if the treatment was sufficient to have been conducted for a long time, without undergoing proper treatment, and by changing the name of the disease and by deceiving the victim by deceiving the victim.

1. The Defendant subscribed respectively to the Master Insurance for Food and Drug (hereinafter referred to as the “Mestomic Life Insurance”) and then hospitalized the instant insurance accident under the pretext of liver disease treatment at the Kanwon-gun, Gangwon-gu, Gangwon-do, Ginwon-gun, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, from June 16, 2003 to July 19, 2003. On July 21, 2003, the Defendant claims for insurance money by deceiving the victim by the above method, including receiving insurance money of KRW 4.170,00 won from the victim on July 28, 2003 and receiving the insurance money of KRW 4.42 times in total from the victim until April 1, 2011, where the Defendant intentionally reported or caused the insurance accident with intent to acquire the insurance money by fraudulent means, and even if so, the Defendant constitutes an insurance accident under the crime of fraud.