2. We examine the reasoning of appeal. ① The defendant suffers from various diseases as a person of distinguished service to the State, and agreed with the victims about the confession and reflect of all the crimes of this case. The court below, reflecting these circumstances, seems to have sentenced to a fine of KRW 2 million by reducing a fine of KRW 3 million as notified by a summary order, ② there is no special change in circumstances to determine a punishment differently from the court below, ③ other crime records (in particular, in 2010, a fine of KRW 4 million has been sentenced for larceny the same type as the crime of this case), ③ the contents and frequency of the crime of this case, the age and age of the defendant, family relationship, economic form, the means and method of the crime, the result, the circumstances after the crime, and other various factors of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case are considered to be appropriate.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is groundless.