However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal history] On January 31, 2013, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1,00,000 as a fine for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving in Drinking) in support of the Sungnam branch of Suwon branch, and on May 29, 2014, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 as a fine for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving in Drinking) in support of the Suwon branch of Suwon branch of Suwon branch of Korea.

[Criminal facts] On November 4, 2017, the Defendant driven a BA-hurd-hurd-hurd-hurged-purged-purg-purg-purg-purg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurgg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurg

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, and criminal investigation report (Attachment to summary orders) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. In full view of the favorable circumstances, such as the circumstance in which the defendant, who had been sentenced several times for the same kind of crime for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, committed the instant crime, and the circumstances that have no record of punishment heavier than that of a fine, etc., a sentence identical to the order shall be imposed.