A. Facts of recognition 1) Defendant Gyeongcheon-si (hereinafter “Defendant Sacheon-si”)

(3) On June 7, 2012, Defendant SAD Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant SAD Construction”)

the G market facility modernization project in Sacheon-si (hereinafter referred to as “instant construction”)

)에 관하여 도급을 주었고, 피고 에스에이치건설은 이 사건 공사 현장에서 직접 이 사건 공사의 관리 및 감독을 하였다. 2) 원고 A은 2012. 6. 21. 14:05경 위 G시장 시설현대화사업장 내에 있던 높이 8미터의 2층 공중화장실 철거작업 현장 주변을 지나고 있었는데, 공중화장실 철거작업을 위한 굴삭기를 운전하고 있던 피고 E가 굴삭기를 작동하면서 굴삭기에 부착되어 있는 일명 크라샤로 벽면의 일부를 잡아당겨 벽면 일부를 공사 현장 외부에 설치되어 있던 안전 휀스 밖으로 튕겨 나가게 하였고, 이에 원고 A은 벽면 일부 및 철근 등의 구조물에 깔려 우측 근위 경골 개방성 골절, 양측 치골 골절, 비골 골절, 요도 손상, 좌측 척골신경 손상 등을 입었다.

(3) Defendant EAD Construction awarded a contract for the removal of the instant construction works to the non-party H Co., Ltd. using construction machinery, such as scrails, and Defendant E was employed from Non-party I belonging to H Co., Ltd as a daily article and caused the instant accident during the instant accident period. Defendant E was employed as a daily article from Non-party I belonging to H Co., Ltd., causing the instant accident during the instant accident period. 【No dispute exists in the grounds for recognition. 【No dispute exists, the entries in the evidence Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 (including serial numbers) are included in the entire purport of the pleadings.

B. Article 756 of the Civil Act provides that the employer’s liability under Article 756 of the judgment on the construction of Defendant E and the claim against Defendant E shall be borne by the employee who used another person to engage in the business to compensate for the damages inflicted on the third party regarding the performance of the business.