beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.05.14 2014고단10144

공무집행방해

Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, only 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On April 20, 2014, from around 10:00 to 16:00, the Korean Disabled Persons Eliminationte Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “former Disabled Persons Eliminationte Co., Ltd”) participated by 200 persons from Gangnam-gu bus terminal squares (Before the departure of the terminal No. 1 in the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seocho-gu distribution Dong, Seoul, and reported to hold an outdoor assembly with the contents of “420 Disabled Persons Eliminationte Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “meeting”)” in the name of the Seoul Disabled Persons Eliminationte Co., Ltd.

Accordingly, from around 10:25 to 11:55 on April 20, 2014, the former president started to move to an express bus platform in order to proceed with the 'high speed bus platform' by 300 participants of the above assembly at around 11:55 on the same day.

On the other hand, the above 300 participants in the assembly were in possession of diskettes and the order maintenance line installed by the police in the outing of the rescue, and the police tried to move out of the reported place to the express bus platform, and the police forced the participants in the assembly who want to move out of the reported place to the platform to the platform.

On April 20, 2014, from around 12:10 to 13:00 on April 20, 2014, the Defendants expressed that the number of the police officers who belong to the Seoul Provincial Police Agency 43 dong Team together with the conference participants, and Defendant A took the bath that “Any person who is a police officer belonging to the Seoul Local Police Agency 43 dong Team knife the chest of the police officer F, who was a police officer, knife the knife the knife, and the knife the knife the knife of the police officer’s knife the knife the knife of the police officer’s knife the knife the knife of the police officer’s knife the knife the knife of the police officer’s knife the knife.”

Accordingly, the Defendants are different.