beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.01 2016고단1853

준강제추행등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a pharmacist operating a “D pharmacy” in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, and is a narcotics handler.

1. A quasi-indecent act Defendant committed an indecent act on September 19, 2015, by taking advantage of the victim’s resistance impossible condition, such as identifying the victim F (53 years) under the influence of alcohol at the Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, and causing pacting the victim F (53 years).

2. A person handling narcotics in violation of the Narcotics Control Act shall not follow a prescription, nor handle narcotics for any purpose other than his/her duties, and where he/she intends to dispose of narcotics, etc., which fall under any reason that makes it impracticable to manage or keep them in inventory even though the period of validity or the period of use has not elapsed, he/she shall prepare an application for the disposal of such narcotics, etc., and submit it to the head of the local food and drug safety

A. The Defendant, for purposes other than the purpose of business, committed an indecent act against F at the time and place set forth in paragraph 1, used a stroke that contains a stroke, which F prepared in advance, in order for F to have the stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke F.

B. Around October 25, 2012, the Defendant voluntarily discarded the accident narcotics at his discretion without preparing an application for the disposal of the accident narcotics, etc. at 855 strokes, which were not prescribed by G from October 25, 2012 to November 4, 2015, among the drugs that were prescribed by the H hospital by brain stroke in the instant D pharmacy operated by the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1.With respect to F and I, respectively.