beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.09.01 2013나2024939

손해배상(기) 등

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal and the plaintiff's claim expanded in the trial are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal and the costs of appeal shall be considered in the trial.

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court should explain in this judgment are as follows: (a) part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be cited as “paragraph (2)”; and (b) the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the addition of the judgment of the plaintiff as “paragraph (3)” under the following, thereby citing it by the main text

2. Parts to be dried;

A. The fifth 18-20th 5th 18-20th 5th 10th 5th 10th 5th 20th 5th 20th 5th 20th 18th 5th 10th 5th 10th 5th 10th 5th 10th 5th 5th 2009 of the 2009 and the 54,375,108th 200 won of the 18th 200th 5th 10th 20th 5th 10th 20th 5th 20th 20th 5th 10th 20th 20th 5th 20th 20th 20th 5th 200 of the 10th 2nd 200th 2nd 1st 200th 2nd 200.

(b) Part VII of the first instance judgment stating that “No evidence exists to acknowledge it” shall be admitted only by all the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff to the trial and the circumstances surrounding the assertion, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.”

C. The 7th judgment of the first instance court was “a service contract with the Defendant regarding the instant tax investigation.”