보조금관리에관한법률위반등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
From November 2003, the Defendant is a person working as the representative director of F Co., Ltd. in Kim Jong-si from November 2003 to the present date, and F Co., Ltd. is a corporation that manufactures mechanical and electronic vision.
On June 28, 2011, F Co., Ltd. was promoted by the Small and Medium Business Administration in relation to “G” tasks among technological innovation development projects for small and medium enterprises in 201, and entered into an agreement with the Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology and a small and medium enterprise development support project, which is a specialized institution for the said projects. On May 22, 2012, F Co., Ltd. was selected as a major institution for the “H” tasks related to the “H projects among the projects for technological innovation development of small and medium enterprises in 2012,” and was designated as a major institution for the “H projects” among the projects for technological innovation development of small and medium enterprises in 201
In addition, as the representative of the main institution in charge of each project above, the defendant has overall control over the above tasks by leading and supervising the application of project costs and the use of project costs, reporting of actual results and settlement
1. A subsidy program operator involved in a crime involving “G” task shall not receive subsidies by filing a false application or by other unlawful means.
Nevertheless, around July 29, 2011, the Defendant did not pay the “PULYGEAR contract deposit” to the F Office of the F Office of the F Office of the F Company, and was thought to be used as the transaction price in the existing part of the FOE UP/LW outside Class 7, which is the part supplied by I. However, the Defendant issued a false tax invoice as if the F Company should pay the “PULYGEAR non-contract deposit” with I in relation to the above development agenda and submitted it to the Small and Medium Business Administration by submitting a false tax invoice as if it had to pay the “PULYGEAR non-contract deposit.” On the same day, the Defendant received a subsidy of KRW 4,163,51 from the victim to the
In addition, around October 25, 2012, it is used as part of the part in the K Office located in the SinguJ in the Singu-si.