The defendant is the representative of C, and the victim D is a company that manufactures smartphones of brand called "E" or "F" in Korea, and the victim G is the representative director of the above company, and H is the head of the intellectual property team of the above company.

On September 24, 2012, the Defendant: (a) connected to the website (I) it opened by using a computer for the purpose of slandering the victim (owner)D at an unsound site; (b) as “G Vice-Chairperson and ethical management is flicking consumers”; (c) as the “G Vice-Chairperson” proposed a patent technology at the stage of application by a large enterprise D without permission for several years, and (d) discovered that technology provider visited D on June 26, 2012, the head of the D Patent Team H may not obtain a patent without permission from the owner of the D Patent Team to prevent the illegal use of the technology without permission, and (d) it would be difficult for the provider of the technology to start up a new website with the database without permission from the owner of the technology for 0:0 p.m., which would be hard for the provider of the technology to start from the D. G. 2, 2012 to 20: G. Vice-Chairperson to 9:0 p.m., 2017.

However, the fact is that the defendant's cell phone is in Korean on May 2004.