However, it is against the Defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

At around 01:30 on July 5, 2014, the Defendants requested that the victim F (year 22) of the victim F (year 22) go away from personnel, and did not properly conduct personnel affairs, on the ground that the victim F (year 22) did not properly conduct personnel affairs, the Defendants committed assault, such as 2-3 times, 2-3 times, 2-3 times, 2-3 times, 2-3 times, 2-3 times, 2-3 times, 2-3, knee, knee, knee, knee, etc., and Defendant B, who was next to the Defendants, committed an assault, such as taking back the victim’s back to 4-5 times.

As a result, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victim as above and inflicted injury on the victim, such as the thring (closed) of the visual floor that requires approximately eight weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The investigation record of each police suspect against F and G;

1. Each police statement made to H, I, and J;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the General Medical Certificate;

1. Relevant Article 2(2) and (1)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment, and the choice of a sentence for the crime

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. The Defendants of the community service order: The Defendants appear to have caused the instant crime on the grounds of contingent punishment for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act; the Defendants are divided into and against their mistakes; some of the money or money deposited for the victims; etc.; however, the degree of the victims’ injuries resulting from the instant crime appears to have been serious; and the victim’s injury level is visible; and the victim’s injury level does not reach an agreement with the victim, etc. shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor; however, a suspended sentence shall be imposed in consideration of the above favorable circumstances.

In the above circumstances, the defendants are required to observe the rules.